Deploying persuasive technology-based model in the prevention and control of malaria in Nigeria to reduce incidence of deaths

Authors

  • Ignatius Nwoyibe Ogbaga
    Department of Computer Science, Ebonyi State University P.M.B 053, Abakaliki, Nigeria
  • Henry Friday Nweke
    Department of Computer Science, Ebonyi State University P.M.B 053, Abakaliki, Nigeria
  • Juliana Ngozi Ndunagu
    Department of Computer Science, National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN), Abuja, Nigeria

Keywords:

Persuasive technology, Malaria prevention and control support system (MPCSS), Active intervention tool, Mosquitoes, Malaria related deaths (MRDs)

Abstract

Specifically among pregnant women and young children under the age of five, malaria is one of the major causes of illnesses and fatalities in Nigeria, and in Africa in general. According to recent research, malaria-related deaths (MRDs) have risen even though the government has implemented numerous intervention strategies to combat this deadly among Nigerians. This is a result of people not using such intervention methods to protect themselves. Further research into why people don’t comply with intervention systems effectively revealed that the interventions are passive, and sometimes complicated to adopt. Consequently, we established three quantifiable research outcomes that will allow us to assess if persuasive technology is appropriate for eradicating malaria-related deaths. We utilize participatory system design (PSD) and User-Centered methods to collect data from research. The participants provided answers to well-designed questionnaires that were used to gather information to analyze the impact of persuasive technology on the prevention and control of malaria-related deaths. The modeling of the intervention system uses the information gathered from the research survey. The Malaria Prevention and Control Support System (MPCSS), an intervention system, was developed and deployed as part of the research in three phases, and its effectiveness was assessed by an evaluation study. The study revealed that applying the suggested persuading technology-based methodology boosted ownership of mosquito nets, involvement in malaria prevention and control activities, and understanding of the risk of malaria-related mortality.

Dimensions

WHO, World malaria report 2020: 20 years of global progress and challenges, 2020 1. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240015791

I. N. Ogbaga & I. A. Ajah, “Co-designing a mobile intervention to support the prevention and control of malaria in low-middle- income communities in Nigeria”, International Journal Information Security Privacy and Digital Forensics 5 (2021) 29. https://library.ncs.org.ng/journal-of-information-security-privacy-and-digital-forensic-volume-5-no-1-june-2021/

WHO, Compendium of WHO malaria guidance: prevention, diagnosis, treatment, surveillance and elimination, 2019. https://fctc.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-CDS-GMP-2019.03

NMEP, Nigeria malaria indication survey, National Population Commission (NPopC), National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), 2015 . https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/mis20/mis20.pdf

I. N. Ogbaga & J. O. Ugah, “A model of personalized mobile persuasive system for malaria prevention and control in Africa”, International Journal of Science and Engineering Resesearch 13 (2022) 842. https://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?A-Model-of-personalized-Mobile-Persuasive-System-for-Malaria-Prevention-and-Control-in-Africa.pdf

M. Nkwo & R. Orji, “Socially responsive ecommerce platforms: design implications for online marketplaces in developing African nation”, in Adjunct Publication of the 27th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, 2019, pp.57-62. https://doi.org/10.1145/3314183.3324984

R. O. Orji, J. Vassileva & R. L. Mandryk, “Modeling gender differences in healthy eating determinants for persuasive intervention design”, in Persuasive Technology: 8th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2013, Sydney, NSW, Australia, April 3-5, 2013. Proceedings, 2013, pp. 161-173. ´https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37157-8_20

H. Oinas-Kukkonen & M. Harjumaa, “A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems”, in Persuasive Technology: Third International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2008, Oulu, Finland, June 4-6, 2008. Proceedings, 2008, pp. 164-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_15

I. N. Ogbaga, M. Nkwo, A. Ifeyinwa & R. Orji, “Co-designing with users: towards a persuasive app to promote the adoption of appropriate malaria prevention and control behaviors in developing nations”, CEUR Work. Proceeding 3153 (2022) 1. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3153/paper14.pdf

Y. D. L. Widyasari, L. E. Nugroho & A. E. Permanasari, “Persuasive technology for enhanced learning behavior in higher education”, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 16 (2019) 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0142-5

S. B. Gram-Hansen, T. S. Jonasen & C. Midden, “Persuasive technology,” in designing for future change: 15th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, PERSUASIVE 2020, Aalborg, Denmark, 2020, pp. 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45712-9

I. Ogbaga, “Artificial intelligence (AI)-based solution to malaria fatalities in Africa: An exploratory review”, Preprints (2023) 2023071133. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202307.1133.v1

O. Oyebode, F. Alqahtani & R. Orji, “Exploring for possible effect of persuasive strategy implementation choices: Towards tailoring persuasive technologies”, in N. Baghaei, J. Vassileva, R. Ali, & K. Oyibo (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2022, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13213 (2022) 145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98438-0_12

X. Liu, X. Ren & S. Pan, “Persuasive design for healthy eating: a scoping review”, in International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Springer, 2022, pp. 292-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05431-0_20

M. M. J. Engelbertink, S. M. Kelders, K. M. Woudt-Mittendorff & G. J. Westerhof, “Participatory design of persuasive technology in a blended learning course: A qualitative study”, Educational and Information Technologies 25 (2022) 4115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10147-x

F. A. Orji & J. Vassileva, “A Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Social Comparison, Competition, and Social Learning in Persuasive Technology on Learning”, in: A. I. Cristea, & C. Troussas (eds), Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 12677 (2021) 369. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_41

S. P. Schinke, T. M. Schwinn & A. J. Ozanian, “Alcohol abuse prevention among high-risk youth: Computer-based intervention”, Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community 29 (2005) 117. https://doi.org/10.1300%2FJ005v29n01_08

Published

2023-12-16

How to Cite

Deploying persuasive technology-based model in the prevention and control of malaria in Nigeria to reduce incidence of deaths. (2023). African Scientific Reports, 2(3), 130. https://doi.org/10.46481/asr.2023.2.3.130

Issue

Volume 2, Issue 3, December 2023

Section

Original Research
Copyright & Licensing

Copyright (c) 2023 Ignatius Nwoyibe Ogbaga, Henry Friday Nweke, Juliana Ngozi Ndunagu

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Deploying persuasive technology-based model in the prevention and control of malaria in Nigeria to reduce incidence of deaths. (2023). African Scientific Reports, 2(3), 130. https://doi.org/10.46481/asr.2023.2.3.130

Similar Articles

61-70 of 88

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)